Current:Home > MyCharges against alleged white supremacists are tossed by a California judge for the second time -Pinnacle Profit Strategies
Charges against alleged white supremacists are tossed by a California judge for the second time
View
Date:2025-04-13 19:12:28
LOS ANGELES (AP) — For the second time in five years, federal charges against alleged members of a violent white supremacist group accused of inciting violence at California political rallies were dismissed by a federal judge who found they were selectively prosecuted.
Federal prosecutors said members of the Rise Above Movement conspired to riot by using the internet to coordinate traveling to political rallies and attacking demonstrators at gatherings in Huntington Beach, Berkeley and San Bernardino in 2018. The group also posted videos to celebrate violence and recruit members.
U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney first tossed the charges against Robert Rundo and Robert Boman in June 2019. The two were charged with conspiracy to violate the Anti-Riot Act and rioting.
On Wednesday, Carney again granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, agreeing that Rundo and Boman were being selectively prosecuted while “far-left extremist groups” were not.
In his decision, Carney wrote “there seems to be little doubt” that Rundo and Boman, or members of their group, engaged in criminal violence. “But they cannot be selected for prosecution because of their repugnant speech and beliefs over those who committed the same violence with the goal of disrupting political events,” Carney wrote.
Boman was already free on bond, while Rundo was still being detained. Prosecutors requested that Rundo remain in custody pending appeal, but Carney denied it and set him free. Soon after the ruling, prosecutors filed a notice that they would appeal, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Outside the courtroom, Boman became emotional and said he was ashamed of his “old antics,” the Times said.
In his 2019 ruling, Carney said the Anti-Riot Act of 1968 was unconstitutional in part because it criminalized advocating violence when no riot or crime was imminent.
veryGood! (1483)
Related
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Malik Willis downplays revenge game narrative for Packers vs. Titans
- JD Souther, singer-songwriter known for work with Eagles and Linda Ronstadt, dies at 78
- Horoscopes Today, September 18, 2024
- Small twin
- Detroit suburbs sue to try to stop the shipment of radioactive soil from New York
- 'STOP!' Meet the humble heroes keeping kids safe every school day
- Tyson Foods Sued Over Emissions Reduction Promises
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Veteran CIA officer who drugged and sexually assaulted dozens of women gets 30 years in prison
Ranking
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Senator’s son to change plea in 2023 crash that killed North Dakota deputy
- FAA investigating after Delta passengers report bleeding ears and noses
- Tupperware, company known for its plastic containers, files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Sam's Club workers to receive raise, higher starting wages, but pay still behind Costco
- Kentucky lawmaker recovering after driving a lawnmower into an empty swimming pool
- Eric Roberts Says Addiction Battle Led to Him Losing Daughter Emma Roberts
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Maternal deaths surged in Texas in 2020, 2021
Indiana woman pleads guilty to hate crime after stabbing Asian American college student
Harvey Weinstein pleads not guilty to new criminal charge in New York
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
State asks judge to pause ruling that struck down North Dakota’s abortion ban
Connecticut aquarium pays over $12K to settle beluga care investigation
Sean Diddy Combs' Alleged Texts Sent After Cassie Attack Revealed in Sex Trafficking Case