Current:Home > ScamsFDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men -Pinnacle Profit Strategies
FDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men
View
Date:2025-04-16 02:01:33
Updated 12:55 p.m. ET
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued proposed guidance Friday to ease restrictions on blood donations by men who have sex with men.
The change is expected to take effect after a public comment period.
The restrictions on donating blood date back to the early days of the AIDS epidemic and were designed to protect the blood supply from HIV. Originally, gay and bisexual men were completely prohibited from donating blood. Over time, the FDA relaxed the lifetime ban, but still kept in place some limits.
Under the current policy — last updated in 2020 — men who have sex with men can donate blood if they haven't had sexual contact with other men for three months.
The new proposed policy would eliminate the time-based restrictions on men who have sex with men (and their female partners) and instead screen potential donors' eligibility based on a series of questions that assess their HIV risk, regardless of gender. Anyone taking medications to treat or prevent HIV, including PrEP, would not be eligible.
The risk assessment would include questions about anal sex. Potential donors who've had anal sex in the last three months with a new sexual partner or more than one sexual partner would not be eligible to give blood.
The changes are aimed at addressing criticism that the current policy is discriminatory and outdated, as well as one more barrier to bolstering the nation's blood supply. Blood banks already routinely screen donated blood for HIV.
"We are moving now to an inclusive policy for blood donation," said Dr. Peter Marks, who leads the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA during a briefing Friday.
"We will continue to work to make sure that we have policies that allow everyone who wants to donate blood to be able to donate blood within what the science allows to make sure that the blood supply remains safe."
In crafting the new guidance, the FDA has been looking to the results of a study of about 1,600 gay and bisexual men to develop screening questions that can identify potential donors who are most likely to be infected with HIV.
Reaction to the news from advocates, medical groups and blood banks has been positive.
"The blood community is very excited about the proposed changes," says Kate Fry, CEO of America's Blood Centers. "We have advocated for a decade now for a move to an individual risk assessment model. So this is very welcome by blood centers across the country."
She stressed that all donated blood is carefully screened for HIV and that testing has improved dramatically to ensure the safety of the blood supply.
For many years, the American Medical Association, the American Red Cross and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have pushed for a change to the federal rules on blood donations.
"These changes are 40-plus years in the making and they're a tremendous leap forward in elevating science over stigma," says Tony Morrison, a spokesperson for the advocacy group GLAAD.
But GLAAD and other groups say the changes still don't go far enough. They argue that some of the remaining restrictions are still unnecessary and stigmatizing, such as the prohibition against donations by people taking medication PrEP to prevent HIV.
"When we limit and defer people who are being proactive in their sexual health that stigmatizes them. The misconception is that people on PrEP are promiscuous or have a higher risk of HIV infection — that's categorically false," says Morrison.
So his group will continue to lobby the FDA to further ease restrictions.
The proposed changes in the blood donation rules will be open for public comment for 60 days. The FDA will then review those comments and issue a final rule, probably later this year. So monogamous gay men could start donating blood again sometime in 2023.
veryGood! (7932)
Related
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer calls for new election in Israel amid increasing criticism of Netanyahu
- As Conflict Rages On, Israel and Gaza’s Environmental Fates May Be Intertwined
- Cardinals land QB Desmond Ridder, send WR Rondale Moore to Falcons in trade, per reports
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Hunger Games' Alexander Ludwig and Wife Lauren Expecting Another Baby
- Alec Baldwin asks judge to dismiss involuntary manslaughter charge in Rust shooting
- US consumer sentiment ticks down slightly, but most expect inflation to ease further
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Who is Mamiko Tanaka? Everything you need to know about Shohei Ohtani's wife
Ranking
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Across the US, batteries and green energies like wind and solar combine for major climate solution
- Kylie Kelce Mourns Death of Her and Jason Kelce’s Beloved Dog Winnie
- Cardinals land QB Desmond Ridder, send WR Rondale Moore to Falcons in trade, per reports
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- ‘Civil War,’ an election-year provocation, premieres at SXSW film festival
- LSU's investment in Kim Mulkey has her atop women's college basketball coaches pay list
- Men's pro teams have been getting subsidies for years. Time for women to get them, too.
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Petco CEO Ron Coughlin steps down, ex-BestBuy exec named as replacement
HBCU internships, trips to Puerto Rico: How police are trying to boost diversity
Odell Beckham Jr. landing spots: Bills and other teams that could use former Ravens WR
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Tractor-trailer goes partly off the New York Thruway after accident
LSU's investment in Kim Mulkey has her atop women's college basketball coaches pay list
Apple to pay $490 million to settle allegations that it misled investors about iPhone sales in China